
Stock image
The day I stood before the judge to finalize my divorce should have marked the beginning of reclaiming my identity. After my divorce, I faced a decision whether to keep my married name, return to my maiden name, or take another surname. The decision impacted my professional profile and future options for school and employment, where I needed to go backward in time to pull records and references.
Now, as a graduate student, what I didn’t expect was that Texas Senate Bill 16 could transform this personal decision into a bureaucratic obstacle course.
The New Reality Under SB16
For anyone contemplating a name change in Texas today—whether due to marriage, divorce, or personal preference— Texas SB16 has fundamentally altered the landscape.
The legislation introduces significantly stricter regulations around the name change process. What was once a relatively straightforward procedure now requires extensive documentation, including proof of identity, criminal background checks, and additional paperwork that scrutinizes your past and present.
The stated purpose of SB16 is to prevent individuals from using name changes to evade legal obligations such as child support or alimony. The bill’s proponents argue that these measures combat fraud and ensure accountability. In practice, however, it creates substantial barriers for people with legitimate reasons to change their names.
The Emotional Toll
For divorced individuals, predominately women, the implications are particularly profound. Many women adopt their spouse’s surname upon marriage, only to find themselves carrying that marker of a failed relationship long after the divorce is finalized.
Under SB16, reverting to a maiden name—a deeply personal choice that represents reclaiming one’s pre-marital identity—has become significantly more difficult.
The process feels invasive and, at times, humiliating. Having to submit to criminal background checks and extensive documentation requirements to simply reclaim a birth name sends an implicit message: the desire to change names warrants suspicion.
Each additional form and verification requirement seems to question motives rather than acknowledge the genuine emotional need to shed an identifier that no longer reflects the present, and the future needs of women leaving a marriage or other similar situations.
Practical Complications
Beyond the emotional weight, SB16 creates practical complications that ripple through every aspect of life. The extended processing time due to additional verification steps means an individual is legally tied to their ex’s name for months longer than anticipated.

This delay affects many elements of identification, from driver’s licenses and social security records to professional email addresses, ID badges or workplace identification.
The financial burden is equally significant. Between filing fees, background check costs and potentially hiring legal assistance to navigate the more complex requirements, the price of a name change has increased substantially.
For those already managing the financial aftermath of divorce, these added expenses can make reclaiming one’s identity feel like an unaffordable luxury.
Broader Social Implications
The effects of SB16 extend beyond individuals directly seeking name changes. The law raises important questions about personal autonomy and the right to self-definition.
By placing such significant barriers around the process of changing one’s name, the legislation effectively discourages a personal choice that has profound significance for many.
For newly married individuals considering whether to take a spouse’s name, the knowledge that reversing this decision would be difficult might influence their initial choice.
For transgender individuals seeking a name that aligns with their gender identity, the additional scrutiny could feel particularly invasive and distressing.
Navigating the System
Despite these challenges, understanding the requirements is the first step toward successfully navigating the name change process under SB16:
Begin gathering documentation early, including birth certificates, marriage licenses, divorce decrees and any other supporting documents.
Budget for all associated costs, including filing fees and background check expenses.
Consider consulting with a family law attorney to help navigate the more complex aspects of the process.
Prepare mentally for potential delays and maintain copies of all submitted documentation.
Once approved, systematically update your name across all relevant accounts, identification documents and professional profiles. Be prepared for confusion as those you interact with acclimate to the change.
A Call for Balance
While fraud prevention and legal accountability are legitimate concerns, there must be a way to address these issues without placing such significant burdens on individuals seeking name changes for personal reasons.
A more balanced approach would recognize that for many—particularly divorced women, newly married individuals and those seeking alignment between their name and identity—the ability to change one’s name represents an important aspect of personal autonomy.
The lengthy process to obtain my new driver’s license bearing my desired name, brings both relief and frustration: relief at having successfully navigated the process, but frustration that what should have been a simple affirmation of personal identity had instead become a test of perseverance.
In asking, “What’s in a name?” we must recognize that the answer is deeply personal—and the pathway to changing that name should respect this profound significance rather than treat it with suspicion.